PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTI vs. STRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTI vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTI achieves a 52.12% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 191.37% return. Over the past 10 years, UTI has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 32.03%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 67.87% annualized return.


UTI

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
52.12%
6M
46.68%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
80.58%
5Y*
45.86%
10Y*
32.03%

STRL

1D
-4.34%
1M
21.74%
YTD
191.37%
6M
182.47%
1Y
301.01%
3Y*
156.96%
5Y*
107.56%
10Y*
67.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTI vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTI
Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
52.12%1.63%105.35%86.31%-14.07%21.05%-16.21%111.23%52.08%-17.53%
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
191.37%81.79%91.57%168.08%24.71%41.32%32.17%29.29%-33.11%92.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UTI and STRL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2003

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTI:

$2.22B

STRL:

$27.69B

EPS

UTI:

$0.77

STRL:

$11.19

PE Ratio

UTI:

51.89

STRL:

79.74

PEG Ratio

UTI:

0.34

STRL:

1.70

PS Ratio

UTI:

2.55

STRL:

9.58

PB Ratio

UTI:

6.52

STRL:

23.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTI:

$868.99M

STRL:

$2.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTI:

$208.88M

STRL:

$664.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

UTI:

$76.70M

STRL:

$429.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTI vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTI
UTI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTI vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTISTRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.52

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

9.78

-9.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

26.42

-25.51

UTI vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTI and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTI vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTI drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, roughly equal to the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTI and STRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTISTRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.06%

-92.51%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.94%

-31.02%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

-47.67%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.19%

-47.67%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

-59.60%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.47%

-10.21%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-46.26%

-19.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

11.45%

+4.60%

Volatility

UTI vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is 21.60%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 25.63%. This indicates that UTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTISTRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.60%

25.63%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.05%

63.91%

-23.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.52%

82.73%

-26.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.34%

57.43%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.46%

53.66%

-0.20%

Dividends

UTI vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTI nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTI
Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%5.15%

Financials

UTI vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
221.40M
825.68M
(UTI) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UTI vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
-49.6%
23.5%
Portfolio components
UTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a gross profit of -109.80M and revenue of 221.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -49.6%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

UTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

UTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a net income of 433.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UTI and STRL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (25.63%) compared to UTI (21.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTI dropped -96.06% vs STRL's -92.51%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTI and STRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer