PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTI vs. CVNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTI vs. CVNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Carvana Co. (CVNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTI achieves a 52.12% return, which is significantly higher than CVNA's -23.19% return.


UTI

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
52.12%
6M
46.68%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
80.58%
5Y*
45.86%
10Y*
32.03%

CVNA

1D
-2.76%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
-23.19%
6M
-25.88%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
147.39%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTI vs. CVNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTI
Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
52.12%1.63%105.35%86.31%-14.07%21.05%-16.21%111.23%52.08%-33.15%
CVNA
Carvana Co.
-23.19%107.52%284.13%1,016.88%-97.96%-3.24%160.23%181.41%71.08%41.63%

Correlation

The correlation between UTI and CVNA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTI:

$2.22B

CVNA:

$9.60B

EPS

UTI:

$0.77

CVNA:

$8.69

PE Ratio

UTI:

51.89

CVNA:

7.46

PEG Ratio

UTI:

0.34

CVNA:

0.03

PS Ratio

UTI:

2.55

CVNA:

0.48

PB Ratio

UTI:

6.52

CVNA:

2.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTI:

$868.99M

CVNA:

$22.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTI:

$208.88M

CVNA:

$4.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

UTI:

$76.70M

CVNA:

-$116.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTI vs. CVNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTI
UTI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CVNA
CVNA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CVNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTI vs. CVNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Carvana Co. (CVNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTICVNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.06

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.03

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

0.07

+0.85

UTI vs. CVNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the CVNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTI and CVNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTI vs. CVNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTI drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, roughly equal to the maximum CVNA drawdown of -98.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTI and CVNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTICVNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.06%

-98.99%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.94%

-41.21%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

-53.47%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.19%

-98.99%

+47.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.47%

-32.25%

+20.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-38.22%

-27.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

19.35%

-3.30%

Volatility

UTI vs. CVNA - Volatility Comparison

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Carvana Co. (CVNA) have volatilities of 21.60% and 21.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTICVNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.60%

21.22%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.05%

44.02%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.52%

60.65%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.34%

111.39%

-63.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.46%

99.30%

-45.84%

Dividends

UTI vs. CVNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTI nor CVNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVNA
Carvana Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTI
Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%5.15%

Financials

UTI vs. CVNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Carvana Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
221.40M
6.43B
(UTI) Total Revenue
(CVNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UTI vs. CVNA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Carvana Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
-49.6%
19.8%
Portfolio components
UTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a gross profit of -109.80M and revenue of 221.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -49.6%.

CVNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 6.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

UTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

CVNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported an operating income of 581.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

UTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a net income of 433.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.

CVNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a net income of 250.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UTI and CVNA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTI has higher volatility (21.60%) compared to CVNA (21.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTI dropped -96.06% vs CVNA's -98.99%.

UTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTI and CVNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer