PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTHY vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTHY vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTHY achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than VGLT's -2.15% return.


UTHY

1D
0.77%
1M
-2.84%
6M
-2.13%
YTD
-2.44%
1Y
-1.50%
3Y*
-1.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.02%

VGLT

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.40%
6M
-1.94%
YTD
-2.15%
1Y
-0.79%
3Y*
0.21%
5Y*
-6.97%
10Y*
-1.64%
ALL TIME*
2.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.77M$5.13M$5.93M
$99.45M$99.43M$109.17M

UTHY vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UTHY
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF
-2.44%3.47%-8.07%-2.77%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-2.15%5.35%-6.28%-1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between UTHY and VGLT is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.99

The correlation between UTHY and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTHY vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTHY
UTHY Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
UTHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTHY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UTHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTHY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTHY vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTHYVGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.99

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

-0.11

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

-0.24

-0.19

UTHY vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTHY Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the VGLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTHY and VGLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTHY vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTHY drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTHY and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTHYVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-46.18%

+24.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-7.03%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-13.38%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.30%

-37.93%

+24.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-15.28%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.24%

+0.22%

Volatility

UTHY vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) have volatilities of 2.54% and 2.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTHYVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.48%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.63%

6.36%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

8.41%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.46%

14.46%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.46%

13.74%

-0.28%

UTHY vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTHY vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

UTHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than VGLT's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTHY
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF
4.81%4.53%4.58%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.74%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, UTHY and VGLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UTHY has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to VGLT (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTHY dropped -21.86% vs VGLT's -46.18%.

On 3-year performance, VGLT leads with 0.21% vs -1.17% for UTHY. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGLT has performed better with a 0.21% return vs -1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTHY.

UTHY has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.74% for VGLT.

UTHY tracks ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTHY and 0.03% for VGLT.

VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTHY and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer