PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTHY vs. VGIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTHY vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTHY achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.29% return.


UTHY

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.48%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.39%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
-1.74%
5Y*
10Y*

VGIT

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.06%
YTD
-0.29%
6M
0.04%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTHY vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UTHY
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF
0.07%3.47%-8.07%-2.77%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.29%7.34%1.39%1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between UTHY and VGIT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.86

The correlation between UTHY and VGIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTHY vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTHY
UTHY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
UTHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTHY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
UTHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTHY Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTHY vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTHYVGITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.17

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

1.13

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

3.18

-2.37

UTHY vs. VGIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTHY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the VGIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTHY and VGIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTHY vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTHY drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than VGIT's maximum drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTHY and VGIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTHYVGITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-16.05%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-2.83%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

-4.34%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.07%

-2.22%

-8.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-3.52%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.01%

+1.99%

Volatility

UTHY vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) at 1.15%. This indicates that UTHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTHYVGITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

1.15%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

2.40%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

3.34%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

5.38%

+8.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.62%

4.50%

+9.12%

UTHY vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTHY vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison

UTHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than VGIT's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTHY
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF
4.62%4.53%4.58%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.86%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTHY and VGIT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTHY has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to VGIT (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTHY dropped -21.86% vs VGIT's -16.05%.

On 3-year performance, VGIT leads with 3.69% vs -1.74% for UTHY. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGIT has performed better with a 3.69% return vs -1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTHY.

UTHY has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 3.86% for VGIT.

UTHY tracks ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTHY and 0.03% for VGIT.

VGIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTHY and VGIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer