UTHY vs. GBIL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

UTHY (US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UTHY tracks the ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GBIL tracks the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTHY returned -1.17%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for GBIL. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UTHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

UTHY vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTHY achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 2.03% return.

UTHY

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -2.84%
• 6M: -2.13%
• YTD: -2.44%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: -1.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.02%

GBIL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.74%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.76%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	$54.21M	$51.93M	$68.82M
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF	$5.77M	$5.13M	$5.93M

UTHY vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF	-2.44%	3.47%	-8.07%	-2.77%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	2.03%	4.12%	5.24%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UTHY and GBIL is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023	0.15

Return for Risk

UTHY vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTHY

UTHY Risk / Return Rank: 8
UTHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
UTHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
UTHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7
UTHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
UTHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTHY vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UTHY	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	18.16	-18.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	151.15	-151.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	93.38	-92.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	188.95	-189.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.44	2,263.03	-2,263.47

UTHY vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTHY Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 18.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTHY and GBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UTHY vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTHY drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTHY and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTHY	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-0.76%	-21.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.41%	-0.02%	-7.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.90%	-0.76%	-14.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.30%	0.00%	-13.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-0.04%	-10.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	0.00%	+3.46%

Volatility

UTHY vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that UTHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTHY	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	0.06%	+2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.63%	0.14%	+6.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.92%	0.21%	+8.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.46%	0.58%	+12.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.46%	0.47%	+12.99%

UTHY vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UTHY vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

UTHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than GBIL's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.67%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF	4.81%	4.53%	4.58%	2.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTHY and GBIL in my portfolio?

UTHY and GBIL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTHY or GBIL?

UTHY has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to GBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTHY dropped -21.86% vs GBIL's -0.76%.

Which ETF is better, UTHY or GBIL?

On 3-year performance, GBIL leads with 4.55% vs -1.17% for UTHY. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UTHY or GBIL?

Over the 3-year period, GBIL has performed better with a 4.55% return vs -1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTHY or GBIL?

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UTHY or GBIL?

UTHY has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 3.67% for GBIL.

What is the main difference between UTHY and GBIL?

UTHY tracks ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTHY and 0.12% for GBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.16 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.