PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTG vs. IEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTG vs. IEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTG achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than IEP's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, UTG has outperformed IEP with an annualized return of 9.54%, while IEP has yielded a comparatively lower -3.70% annualized return.


UTG

1D
-0.18%
1M
-5.42%
6M
7.65%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
10.92%

IEP

1D
0.67%
1M
3.43%
6M
9.58%
YTD
13.35%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
-22.70%
5Y*
-19.10%
10Y*
-3.70%
ALL TIME*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTG vs. IEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
11.50%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
13.35%8.23%-37.79%-58.78%18.76%12.87%-3.55%20.44%18.98%-1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UTG and IEP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2004

0.19

The correlation between UTG and IEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTG:

$3.62B

IEP:

$5.07B

EPS

UTG:

$22.08

IEP:

-$1.27

PS Ratio

UTG:

6.77

IEP:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTG:

$532.00M

IEP:

$10.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTG:

$478.68M

IEP:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

UTG:

$2.08B

IEP:

$1.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTG vs. IEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IEP
IEP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEP Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTG vs. IEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTGIEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.07

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

0.36

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

0.74

+1.78

UTG vs. IEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the IEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTG and IEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTG vs. IEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTG drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, smaller than the maximum IEP drawdown of -84.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTG and IEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTGIEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.77%

-84.21%

+16.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-16.06%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-67.81%

+52.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-77.56%

+51.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

-77.56%

+29.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-70.95%

+63.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-30.70%

+21.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

7.75%

-2.13%

Volatility

UTG vs. IEP - Volatility Comparison

Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) at 3.68%. This indicates that UTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTGIEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

3.68%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

13.85%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

23.65%

-6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

40.99%

-23.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

36.31%

-14.64%

Dividends

UTG vs. IEP - Dividend Comparison

UTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than IEP's 26.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
26.53%26.49%40.37%34.90%15.79%16.13%15.79%13.01%12.26%11.32%10.01%9.79%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
6.08%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Financials

UTG vs. IEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reaves Utility Income Trust and Icahn Enterprises L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
123.02M
2.31B
(UTG) Total Revenue
(IEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UTG and IEP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTG has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to IEP (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTG dropped -67.77% vs IEP's -84.21%.

UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTG and IEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer