UTG vs. BTCI
UTG (Reaves Utility Income Trust) is a stock, while BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, UTG returned 28.68% vs -34.62% for BTCI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UTG vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTG achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -25.54% return.
UTG
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- 1Y
- -34.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTG vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust | 17.89% | 23.24% | -1.32% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -25.54% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTG and BTCI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTG vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
UTG
BTCI
UTG vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTG | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.86 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | -0.74 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | -1.31 | +6.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTG vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTG drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTG and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTG | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.77% | -47.16% | -20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -47.16% | +35.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -44.94% | +42.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -15.92% | +7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 26.71% | -21.38% |
Volatility
UTG vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) is 6.16%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that UTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTG | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 12.11% | -5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 31.18% | -17.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.27% | 39.53% | -22.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 40.31% | -23.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 40.31% | -18.68% |
Dividends
UTG vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
UTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than BTCI's 48.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 48.02% | 36.46% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust | 5.70% | 6.42% | 7.19% | 8.53% | 8.07% | 6.35% | 6.59% | 5.69% | 6.86% | 6.21% | 9.02% | 6.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTG and BTCI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to UTG (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTG dropped -67.77% vs BTCI's -47.16%.
UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTG and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer