PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UTF vs. AB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and AB is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

UTF vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.77%
12.83%
UTF
AB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UTF:

1.31

AB:

1.25

Sortino Ratio

UTF:

1.95

AB:

1.84

Omega Ratio

UTF:

1.23

AB:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

UTF:

1.06

AB:

0.75

Martin Ratio

UTF:

6.51

AB:

8.80

Ulcer Index

UTF:

2.99%

AB:

3.15%

Daily Std Dev

UTF:

14.95%

AB:

22.08%

Max Drawdown

UTF:

-72.62%

AB:

-87.65%

Current Drawdown

UTF:

-9.93%

AB:

-17.20%

Fundamentals

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 19.48% return, which is significantly lower than AB's 28.29% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has underperformed AB with an annualized return of 8.50%, while AB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.


UTF

YTD

19.48%

1M

-8.40%

6M

8.77%

1Y

19.43%

5Y*

5.44%

10Y*

8.50%

AB

YTD

28.29%

1M

2.56%

6M

12.83%

1Y

25.27%

5Y*

13.14%

10Y*

12.69%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UTF vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UTF, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.311.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for UTF, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.951.84
The chart of Omega ratio for UTF, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.231.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for UTF, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.060.75
The chart of Martin ratio for UTF, currently valued at 6.51, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.006.518.80
UTF
AB

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the AB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and AB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.31
1.25
UTF
AB

Dividends

UTF vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, less than AB's 8.17% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
7.93%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%6.51%6.99%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
8.17%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%7.32%7.45%

Drawdowns

UTF vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and AB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.93%
-17.20%
UTF
AB

Volatility

UTF vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 4.21%, while AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.21%
8.49%
UTF
AB

Financials

UTF vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab