UTF vs. AB
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB).
Performance
UTF vs. AB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTF vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 10.46% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 1.10% | 13.36% | 30.40% | -2.29% | -23.46% | 56.27% | 23.00% | 19.85% | 21.04% | 16.76% |
Fundamentals
UTF:
$2.53B
AB:
$3.44B
UTF:
$6.79
AB:
$2.89
UTF:
3.85
AB:
13.17
UTF:
6.54
AB:
11.86
UTF:
0.89
AB:
2.92
UTF:
$387.16M
AB:
$332.76M
UTF:
$388.42M
AB:
$332.76M
UTF:
$765.72M
AB:
$243.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than AB's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has underperformed AB with an annualized return of 11.46%, while AB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
UTF
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 11.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
AB
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTF vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank
UTF
AB
UTF vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTF | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.28 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 0.59 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.07 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.51 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 1.26 | +1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTF | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.28 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.25 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.43 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTF and AB is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UTF vs. AB - Dividend Comparison
UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than AB's 8.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.05% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 8.90% | 9.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% |
Drawdowns
UTF vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and AB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTF | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.62% | -87.65% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | -15.41% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -45.76% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.53% | -58.08% | +5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -9.10% | +5.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.44% | -26.30% | +15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 6.19% | -0.89% |
Volatility
UTF vs. AB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 4.61%, while AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTF | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 7.87% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 18.86% | -9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 26.65% | -10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 28.49% | -9.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 32.45% | -9.07% |
Financials
UTF vs. AB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities