UTF vs. AGNC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) and AGNC (AGNC Investment Corp.) are both stocks. UTF operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while AGNC operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, UTF returned 11.45%/yr vs 6.25%/yr for AGNC. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UTF vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has outperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 11.45%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.25% annualized return.

UTF

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 15.84%
• 6M: 18.47%
• 1Y: 12.54%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

AGNC

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -5.84%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: 27.55%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: 6.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTF vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	15.84%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	6.93%	42.74%	-9.87%	34.10%
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	-0.32%	34.92%	8.90%	10.14%	-21.65%	5.20%	-1.78%	13.31%	-2.46%	23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and AGNC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008	0.32

The correlation between UTF and AGNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap UTF : $2.62B AGNC : $11.35B
EPS UTF : $6.79 AGNC : $1.33
PE Ratio UTF : 3.99 AGNC : 7.60
PEG Ratio UTF : 0.03 AGNC : 0.02
PS Ratio UTF : 6.78 AGNC : 4.66
PB Ratio UTF : 0.92 AGNC : 1.11
Total Revenue (TTM) UTF : $387.16M AGNC : $2.33B
Gross Profit (TTM) UTF : $388.42M AGNC : $2.30B
EBITDA (TTM) UTF : $765.72M AGNC : $3.72B

Return for Risk

UTF vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 67
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 64

AGNC

AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 75
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 74
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTF vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTF	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.43	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.02	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	1.48	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	4.39	-1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTF vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTF	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	1.43	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.06	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.25	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.42	+0.03

Drawdowns

UTF vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and AGNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTF	AGNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.62%	-54.56%	-18.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.33%	-18.71%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.06%	-31.04%	+9.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.28%	-54.36%	+24.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.53%	-54.56%	+2.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-12.19%	+11.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-13.56%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	6.30%	-1.25%

Volatility

UTF vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 2.67%, while AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTF	AGNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	4.92%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.39%	15.96%	-7.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	19.38%	-7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.33%	25.82%	-7.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.36%	25.39%	-2.03%

Dividends

UTF vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than AGNC's 14.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	14.24%	13.43%	15.64%	14.68%	13.91%	9.57%	10.00%	11.31%	12.31%	10.70%	12.69%	14.30%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	6.90%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTF and AGNC in my portfolio?

UTF and AGNC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTF or AGNC?

AGNC has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to UTF (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.