UTES.TO vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
UTES.TO and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTES.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Sep 3, 2024. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006.
Performance
UTES.TO vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTES.TO vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 9.57% | 18.66% | -4.25% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -12.17% | 24.38% | 28.00% |
Different Trading Currencies
UTES.TO is traded in CAD, while QLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -12.17% return.
UTES.TO
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- 6.60%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- YTD
- -12.17%
- 6M
- -11.11%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 36.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- 30.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTES.TO vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UTES.TO vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
UTES.TO
QLD
UTES.TO vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTES.TO | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 0.75 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 1.30 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.33 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 4.01 | +6.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTES.TO | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 0.75 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.89 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES.TO and QLD is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
UTES.TO vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 15.76% | 18.30% | 6.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
UTES.TO vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -61.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES.TO | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -83.13% | +72.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -25.13% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -20.10% | +17.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -18.30% | +15.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 7.67% | -5.66% |
Volatility
UTES.TO vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) is 3.44%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.76%. This indicates that UTES.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTES.TO | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 12.76% | -9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.98% | 25.21% | -18.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 44.19% | -33.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 42.70% | -31.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 42.55% | -31.43% |