PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UTES.TO having a 9.53% return and HUTL.TO slightly higher at 9.80%.


UTES.TO

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.62%
6M
5.91%
YTD
9.53%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.16%

HUTL.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.52%
6M
4.29%
YTD
9.80%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.01MCA$1.14MCA$1.22M
CA$3.53MCA$2.89MCA$2.74M

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UTES.TO and HUTL.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.52

The correlation between UTES.TO and HUTL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HUTL.TO
HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTES.TOHUTL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.89

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

7.27

-0.55

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES.TO and HUTL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, smaller than the maximum HUTL.TO drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and HUTL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTES.TOHUTL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-34.00%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-4.54%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-3.45%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-6.56%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.80%

+0.46%

Volatility

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) at 3.99%. This indicates that UTES.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTES.TOHUTL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

3.99%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

9.33%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

10.77%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.46%

13.05%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.46%

15.19%

-3.73%

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.50%, more than HUTL.TO's 7.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF
7.88%7.94%8.30%8.56%8.13%7.16%7.73%6.76%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund
18.50%18.30%6.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES.TO and HUTL.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUTL.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUTL.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for UTES.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for UTES.TO and 0.67% for HUTL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES.TO and HUTL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer