UTEN vs. SPYGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and Spyglass Growth Fund (SPYGX).

UTEN is a passively managed fund by US Benchmark Series that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. SPYGX is managed by Spyglass Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 29, 2017.

Performance

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and Spyglass Growth Fund (SPYGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF	-0.06%	7.82%	-1.67%	3.18%	-7.79%
SPYGX Spyglass Growth Fund	-27.11%	15.74%	38.10%	54.03%	-18.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than SPYGX's -27.11% return.

UTEN

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 1.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPYGX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -12.59%
• YTD: -27.11%
• 6M: -26.70%
• 1Y: -0.41%
• 3Y*: 16.88%
• 5Y*: -3.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYGX's 1.05% expense ratio.

SPYGX

Spyglass Growth Fund

UTEN

US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF

Return for Risk

UTEN vs. SPYGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTEN

UTEN Risk / Return Rank: 34
UTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
UTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
UTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 29
UTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
UTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SPYGX

SPYGX Risk / Return Rank: 5
SPYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SPYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SPYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SPYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
SPYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and Spyglass Growth Fund (SPYGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTEN	SPYGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	-0.05	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	0.14	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.02	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	-0.13	+1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.63	-0.43	+3.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the SPYGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTEN and SPYGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTEN	SPYGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	-0.05	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.29	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between UTEN and SPYGX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Dividend Comparison

UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, while SPYGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF	4.07%	4.11%	4.13%	3.62%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYGX Spyglass Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	10.07%	2.71%	0.25%	4.95%

Drawdowns

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, smaller than the maximum SPYGX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and SPYGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTEN	SPYGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.36%	-60.08%	+46.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.87%	-30.05%	+26.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-29.97%	+27.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-19.67%	+14.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	9.31%	-7.78%

Volatility

UTEN vs. SPYGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) is 2.09%, while Spyglass Growth Fund (SPYGX) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that UTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTEN	SPYGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	7.46%	-5.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.54%	18.04%	-14.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.89%	30.83%	-24.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.17%	30.20%	-22.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.17%	29.16%	-20.99%