UTEN vs. IBTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UTEN (US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UTEN tracks the ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. UTEN charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.

Performance

UTEN vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UTEN

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 6M: -1.30%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 1.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTEN vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF	-0.85%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

UTEN vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTEN

UTEN Risk / Return Rank: 22
UTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
UTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
UTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
UTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
UTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTEN vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTEN	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.82	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTEN	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	—	—

Drawdowns

UTEN vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTEN	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.36%	0.00%	-13.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	0.00%	-3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	0.00%	-4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UTEN	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.24%	0.00%	+5.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.05%	0.00%	+8.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.05%	0.00%	+8.05%

UTEN vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UTEN vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF	4.05%	4.11%	4.13%	3.62%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, UTEN or IBTE?

On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTEN or IBTE?

IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UTEN or IBTE?

UTEN has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

What is the main difference between UTEN and IBTE?

UTEN tracks ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTEN and 0.07% for IBTE.