USXF vs. QARP
USXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - USXF tracks the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USXF returned 14.27%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USXF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
USXF vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USXF achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 12.78% return.
USXF
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 1Y
- 22.90%
- 3Y*
- 23.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.27%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
USXF vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 16.22% | 16.97% | 26.16% | 31.65% | -21.20% | 27.14% | 23.07% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 19.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between USXF and QARP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between USXF and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USXF vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USXF
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
USXF
QARP
Financial Services
USXF
QARP
Industrials
USXF
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
USXF
QARP
Healthcare
USXF
QARP
Real Estate
USXF
QARP
Basic Materials
USXF
QARP
Communication Services
USXF
QARP
Utilities
USXF
QARP
Consumer Defensive
USXF
QARP
Energy
USXF
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USXF vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
USXF
QARP
USXF vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USXF | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.46 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 15.38 | -7.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USXF vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USXF drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USXF and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USXF | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -35.44% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -7.26% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.93% | -15.65% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | -22.75% | -6.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | 0.00% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -4.39% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 1.63% | +1.11% |
Volatility
USXF vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that USXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USXF | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 2.76% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.28% | 8.22% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 10.58% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 15.54% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 19.55% | -0.18% |
USXF vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
USXF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USXF vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
USXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 0.83% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.86% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USXF and QARP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USXF has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USXF dropped -29.54% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, USXF leads with 14.27% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, USXF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USXF has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USXF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.83% for USXF.
USXF tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USXF and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USXF and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer