USXF vs. DGRO
USXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - USXF tracks the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USXF returned 14.32%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for DGRO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USXF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
USXF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USXF achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 12.23% return.
USXF
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 25.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 14.32%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 21.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
USXF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 17.64% | 16.97% | 26.16% | 31.65% | -21.20% | 27.14% | 23.07% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 12.23% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 19.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between USXF and DGRO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USXF and DGRO has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USXF vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USXF
DGRO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
USXF
DGRO
Financial Services
USXF
DGRO
Industrials
USXF
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
USXF
DGRO
Healthcare
USXF
DGRO
Real Estate
USXF
DGRO
-
Basic Materials
USXF
DGRO
Communication Services
USXF
DGRO
Utilities
USXF
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
USXF
DGRO
Energy
USXF
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USXF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
USXF
DGRO
USXF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USXF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.42 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 3.36 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 12.98 | -3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USXF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USXF drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USXF and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USXF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -35.10% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -6.47% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.93% | -14.03% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | -19.31% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -0.50% | -2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -3.42% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 1.67% | +1.05% |
Volatility
USXF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.52%. This indicates that USXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USXF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 2.52% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 6.94% | +8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 9.50% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 13.79% | +6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 16.57% | +2.80% |
USXF vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USXF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USXF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
USXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than DGRO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.91% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 0.82% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.86% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USXF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USXF has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to DGRO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USXF dropped -29.54% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, USXF leads with 14.32% vs 11.06% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USXF has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USXF.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.82% for USXF.
USXF tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USXF and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USXF and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer