USXF vs. ACWI
USXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USXF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USXF returned 15.70%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USXF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
USXF vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USXF achieves a 20.76% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return.
USXF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 10.32%
- YTD
- 20.76%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- 35.21%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
USXF vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 20.76% | 16.97% | 26.16% | 31.65% | -21.20% | 27.14% | 24.04% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 23.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between USXF and ACWI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between USXF and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
USXF vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USXF
ACWI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
USXF
ACWI
Financial Services
USXF
ACWI
Industrials
USXF
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
USXF
ACWI
Healthcare
USXF
ACWI
Real Estate
USXF
ACWI
Communication Services
USXF
ACWI
Basic Materials
USXF
ACWI
Utilities
USXF
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
USXF
ACWI
Energy
USXF
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USXF vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
USXF
ACWI
USXF vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USXF | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 3.01 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 13.53 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USXF | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.29 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.71 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.43 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
USXF vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USXF drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USXF and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USXF | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -56.00% | +26.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -9.73% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.93% | -16.55% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | -26.42% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.83% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -8.61% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.16% | +0.37% |
Volatility
USXF vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that USXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USXF | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 3.93% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 10.29% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 12.78% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 16.05% | +3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 17.11% | +2.07% |
USXF vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
USXF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
USXF vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
USXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 0.80% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.86% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USXF and ACWI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USXF has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USXF dropped -29.54% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 5-year performance, USXF leads with 15.70% vs 11.28% for ACWI. On fees, USXF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USXF has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USXF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.80% for USXF.
USXF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. USXF tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USXF and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USXF and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer