PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USVM vs. PTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USVM vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 77.58% return.


USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*

PTF

1D
0.27%
1M
19.05%
YTD
77.58%
6M
74.93%
1Y
109.08%
3Y*
43.28%
5Y*
23.79%
10Y*
26.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USVM vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
77.58%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between USVM and PTF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.67

The correlation between USVM and PTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USVM vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USVM
PTF

Financial Services

22.0%
1.4%

Industrials

12.1%
1.8%

Real Estate

11.9%

-

Technology

11.6%
92.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Healthcare

11.0%

-

Utilities

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.4%
1.6%

Communication Services

2.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Financial Services

USVM
22.0%
PTF
1.4%

Industrials

USVM
12.1%
PTF
1.8%

Real Estate

USVM
11.9%
PTF

-

Technology

USVM
11.6%
PTF
92.9%

Consumer Cyclical

USVM
11.1%
PTF

-

Healthcare

USVM
11.0%
PTF

-

Utilities

USVM
6.4%
PTF

-

Consumer Defensive

USVM
5.0%
PTF

-

Energy

USVM
4.4%
PTF
1.6%

Communication Services

USVM
2.8%
PTF
5.8%

Basic Materials

USVM
1.8%
PTF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USVM vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USVM vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USVMPTFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

2.86

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

3.15

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

6.10

-2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.76

24.27

-10.51

USVM vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USVM and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USVMPTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.86

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.68

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Drawdowns

USVM vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and PTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USVMPTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.38%

-55.38%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-17.99%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-36.11%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-44.88%

+19.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

0.00%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-13.27%

+5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

4.51%

-2.29%

Volatility

USVM vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is 4.50%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that USVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USVMPTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

13.27%

-8.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

29.47%

-18.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

38.39%

-23.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

34.95%

-15.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

32.94%

-10.93%

USVM vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

USVM vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USVM and PTF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs PTF's -55.38%.

On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 23.79% vs 9.74% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 9.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.60% for PTF.

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USVM and PTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer