PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UST vs. TTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UST vs. TTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UST achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than TTT's 3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, UST has underperformed TTT with an annualized return of -2.13%, while TTT has yielded a comparatively higher -1.20% annualized return.


UST

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-4.24%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
-0.51%
5Y*
-6.75%
10Y*
-2.13%

TTT

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
3.59%
6M
10.09%
1Y
-6.82%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
-1.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UST vs. TTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
-2.88%10.26%-6.19%0.16%-30.19%-7.81%18.83%13.34%-1.09%3.21%
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
3.59%-7.89%38.07%-11.25%150.17%2.55%-54.12%-34.88%6.34%-25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between UST and TTT is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

-0.91

The correlation between UST and TTT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.91 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

UST vs. TTT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UST
TTT

Financial Services

97.4%
62.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

UST
97.4%
TTT
62.5%

Basic Materials

UST

-

TTT

-

Communication Services

UST

-

TTT

-

Consumer Cyclical

UST

-

TTT

-

Consumer Defensive

UST

-

TTT

-

Energy

UST

-

TTT

-

Healthcare

UST

-

TTT

-

Industrials

UST

-

TTT

-

Real Estate

UST

-

TTT

-

Technology

UST

-

TTT

-

Utilities

UST

-

TTT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UST vs. TTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UST
UST Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UST Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UST Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TTT
TTT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UST vs. TTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTTTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.98

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

-0.31

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

-0.58

+1.84

UST vs. TTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UST Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the TTT Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UST and TTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTTTTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.23

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.37

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

-0.03

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.23

+0.42

Drawdowns

UST vs. TTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UST drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum TTT drawdown of -94.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UST and TTT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTTTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

-94.00%

+46.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-22.18%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-49.69%

+32.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

-49.69%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.99%

-81.76%

+33.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.33%

-78.28%

+39.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-70.36%

+55.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

12.13%

-9.10%

Volatility

UST vs. TTT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) is 3.10%, while UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that UST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTTTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

8.69%

-5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

19.48%

-12.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

29.26%

-19.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

47.18%

-31.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

43.38%

-30.20%

UST vs. TTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UST and TTT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UST vs. TTT - Dividend Comparison

UST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than TTT's 9.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
9.34%9.87%4.86%12.15%0.34%0.00%0.29%1.88%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
3.49%3.65%4.09%3.49%0.47%0.27%0.53%1.42%1.71%0.84%0.64%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


UST and TTT have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTT has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to UST (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UST dropped -47.99% vs TTT's -94.00%.

On 10-year performance, TTT leads with -1.20% vs -2.13% for UST. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UST has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TTT has performed better with a -1.20% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UST and TTT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.34%, compared with 3.49% for UST.

UST tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%).

UST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UST and TTT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer