UST vs. EEV
UST (ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury) and EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) are both exchange-traded funds - UST is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while EEV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UST returned -2.35%/yr vs -24.12%/yr for EEV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UST vs. EEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UST achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly higher than EEV's -39.72% return. Over the past 10 years, UST has outperformed EEV with an annualized return of -2.35%, while EEV has yielded a comparatively lower -24.12% annualized return.
UST
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- -6.85%
- 10Y*
- -2.35%
EEV
- 1D
- 11.50%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -39.72%
- 6M
- -40.50%
- 1Y
- -56.22%
- 3Y*
- -33.55%
- 5Y*
- -15.31%
- 10Y*
- -24.12%
UST vs. EEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UST ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury | -2.82% | 10.26% | -6.19% | 0.16% | -30.19% | -7.81% | 18.83% | 13.34% | -1.09% | 3.21% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -39.72% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | -4.99% | -48.93% | -30.87% | 24.06% | -49.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between UST and EEV is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2010 | 0.17 |
The correlation between UST and EEV shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UST vs. EEV — Risk / Return Rank
UST
EEV
UST vs. EEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UST | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.75 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | -0.96 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | -1.82 | +2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UST vs. EEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UST drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum EEV drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UST and EEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UST | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -99.88% | +51.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -58.68% | +49.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.66% | -77.51% | +60.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.97% | -81.14% | +37.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.99% | -94.47% | +46.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.29% | -99.87% | +61.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.20% | -93.00% | +77.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 33.75% | -30.38% |
Volatility
UST vs. EEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) is 2.71%, while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) has a volatility of 24.52%. This indicates that UST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UST | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 24.52% | -21.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.85% | 41.58% | -34.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.34% | 45.86% | -36.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 39.50% | -24.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 41.47% | -28.31% |
UST vs. EEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UST and EEV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UST vs. EEV - Dividend Comparison
UST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than EEV's 7.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.17% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UST ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury | 3.49% | 3.65% | 4.09% | 3.49% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 0.53% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 0.84% | 0.64% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UST and EEV have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEV has higher volatility (24.52%) compared to UST (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UST dropped -47.99% vs EEV's -99.88%.
On 10-year performance, UST leads with -2.35% vs -24.12% for EEV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UST has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UST has performed better with a -2.35% return vs -24.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UST and EEV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 3.49% for UST.
UST is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while EEV is Leveraged Equities. UST tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while EEV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%).
UST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UST and EEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer