PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSH vs. SPTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSH vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USSH) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSH achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPTS's 0.45% return.


USSH

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPTS

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.77%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
1.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSH vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USSH
WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund
0.39%5.00%3.87%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
0.45%5.05%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between USSH and SPTS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.93

The correlation between USSH and SPTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSH vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSH
USSH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
USSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
USSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSH vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USSH) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSHSPTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.55

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

4.13

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

16.52

-1.62

USSH vs. SPTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the SPTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSH and SPTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSHSPTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.63

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.74

0.49

+2.25

Drawdowns

USSH vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSH drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum SPTS drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSH and SPTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSHSPTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-5.83%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.87%

-0.84%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.28%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-1.72%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

0.21%

+0.01%

Volatility

USSH vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USSH) has a higher volatility of 0.36% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) at 0.34%. This indicates that USSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSHSPTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.34%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

0.86%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29%

1.32%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.53%

1.98%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.53%

1.72%

-0.19%

USSH vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USSH vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison

USSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than SPTS's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%
USSH
WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund
3.64%3.67%3.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, USSH and SPTS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USSH has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to SPTS (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSH dropped -1.01% vs SPTS's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, SPTS leads with 3.45% vs 3.27% for USSH. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPTS has performed better with a 3.45% return vs 3.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USSH.

SPTS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.64% for USSH.

USSH tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 1-3 Year Laddered Index, while SPTS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USSH and 0.03% for SPTS.

SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSH and SPTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer