USSH vs. FFUT
USSH (WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USSH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 1-3 Year Laddered Index, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. USSH is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. USSH charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.
Performance
USSH vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSH achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 12.74% return.
USSH
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USSH vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USSH WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund | 0.39% | 2.78% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 12.74% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSH and FFUT is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSH vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank
USSH
FFUT
USSH vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USSH) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSH | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.29 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSH | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.74 | 2.01 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
USSH vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSH drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSH and FFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSH | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -2.84% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.90% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.20% | -0.88% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | — | — |
Volatility
USSH vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSH | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29% | 11.17% | -9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 11.17% | -9.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 11.17% | -9.64% |
USSH vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
USSH vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison
USSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than FFUT's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.85% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
USSH WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund | 3.64% | 3.67% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USSH and FFUT have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.
USSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.85% for FFUT.
USSH is categorized as Government Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USSH and 0.80% for FFUT.
Find the right allocation for USSH and FFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer