PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSG vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSG vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSG achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.66% return.


USSG

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
8.92%
6M
8.06%
1Y
27.66%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSG vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
8.92%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%19.24%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.66%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between USSG and BIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSG vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSG vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USSGBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-170.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

87.41

-86.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

353.28

-350.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

2,801.35

-2,790.86

USSG vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSG and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USSG vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSG drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSG and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSGBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-0.78%

-33.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-0.01%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-0.01%

-19.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.00%

-0.09%

-26.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

0.00%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-0.26%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

0.00%

+2.64%

Volatility

USSG vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that USSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSGBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

0.07%

+5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

0.14%

+10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

0.20%

+13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

0.26%

+17.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

0.26%

+19.91%

USSG vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USSG vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.99%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSG and BIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USSG has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSG dropped -34.10% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 13.57% vs 3.45% for BIL. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 13.57% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.99% for USSG.

USSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USSG and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.37 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSG and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer