USSG vs. BBUS
USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - USSG tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USSG returned 13.79%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. USSG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
USSG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSG achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.
USSG
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
USSG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 9.51% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 16.55% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSG and BBUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.97 |
The correlation between USSG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
USSG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USSG
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
USSG
BBUS
Communication Services
USSG
BBUS
Financial Services
USSG
BBUS
Healthcare
USSG
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
USSG
BBUS
Industrials
USSG
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
USSG
BBUS
Real Estate
USSG
BBUS
Basic Materials
USSG
BBUS
Energy
USSG
BBUS
Utilities
USSG
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
USSG
BBUS
USSG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.00 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 13.76 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.33 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
USSG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSG drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSG and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -35.35% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -9.21% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -19.01% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -25.46% | -1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.74% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -5.46% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.00% | +0.61% |
Volatility
USSG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that USSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 2.88% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 8.96% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 11.87% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 17.03% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 19.59% | +0.57% |
USSG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USSG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, USSG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USSG has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSG dropped -34.10% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 13.79% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 13.79% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USSG.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.95% for USSG.
USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USSG and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USSG and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer