PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSG achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.


USSG

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.67%
YTD
9.51%
6M
10.19%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
9.51%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%16.55%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between USSG and BBUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.97

The correlation between USSG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

USSG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USSG
BBUS

Technology

36.9%
37.1%

Communication Services

14.5%
10.8%

Financial Services

10.6%
10.8%

Healthcare

9.6%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.4%

Industrials

8.1%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.2%

Energy

2.1%
3.2%

Utilities

1.1%
2.6%

Technology

USSG
36.9%
BBUS
37.1%

Communication Services

USSG
14.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Financial Services

USSG
10.6%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

USSG
9.6%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

USSG
8.6%
BBUS
9.4%

Industrials

USSG
8.1%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

USSG
4.2%
BBUS
4.5%

Real Estate

USSG
2.2%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

USSG
2.1%
BBUS
1.2%

Energy

USSG
2.1%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

USSG
1.1%
BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.00

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

13.76

-3.03

USSG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSG and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSGBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.33

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.79

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.84

0.00

Drawdowns

USSG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSG drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-35.35%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-9.21%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-19.01%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.00%

-25.46%

-1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.74%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-5.46%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.00%

+0.61%

Volatility

USSG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that USSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

2.88%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

8.96%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

11.87%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

17.03%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

19.59%

+0.57%

USSG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USSG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.95%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, USSG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USSG has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSG dropped -34.10% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 13.79% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 13.79% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USSG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.95% for USSG.

USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USSG and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer