USSE vs. MOO
USSE (Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USSE is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past year, USSE returned 30.78% vs 12.97% for MOO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USSE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
USSE vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSE achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 10.23% return.
USSE
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
USSE vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USSE Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF | 21.52% | 2.50% | 24.49% | 5.01% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 10.23% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSE and MOO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | 0.35 |
USSE vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USSE
MOO
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USSE
MOO
-
Financial Services
USSE
MOO
-
Industrials
USSE
MOO
Consumer Cyclical
USSE
MOO
-
Communication Services
USSE
MOO
-
Energy
USSE
MOO
-
Healthcare
USSE
MOO
Basic Materials
USSE
-
MOO
Consumer Defensive
USSE
-
MOO
Real Estate
USSE
-
MOO
-
Utilities
USSE
-
MOO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSE vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
USSE
MOO
USSE vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.17 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 1.54 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 3.82 | +8.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.94 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.22 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
USSE vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSE drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSE and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.36% | -69.53% | +47.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -8.45% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.40% | +17.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -16.97% | +13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.40% | -0.85% |
Volatility
USSE vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) at 3.87%. This indicates that USSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.87% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 10.57% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 13.87% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.11% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 18.19% | -1.94% |
USSE vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
USSE vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
USSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.24% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
USSE Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USSE and MOO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USSE has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to MOO (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSE dropped -22.36% vs MOO's -69.53%.
On 1-year performance, USSE leads with 30.78% vs 12.97% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USSE has performed better with a 30.78% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for USSE.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.00% for USSE.
They also come from different issuers: Segall Bryant & Hamill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for USSE and 0.55% for MOO.
USSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USSE and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer