USSE vs. FMAY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

USSE (Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - USSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill, while FMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. USSE is actively managed, while FMAY is passively managed. Over the past year, USSE returned 26.51% vs 12.00% for FMAY. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. USSE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.

Performance

USSE vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSE achieves a 18.60% return, which is significantly higher than FMAY's 5.43% return.

USSE

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 15.94%
• YTD: 18.60%
• 1Y: 26.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.18%

FMAY

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 4.78%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 1Y: 12.00%
• 3Y*: 12.48%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	$1.41M	$1.35M	$5.09M
USSE Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF	$1.27M	$1.17M	$1.07M

USSE vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USSE Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF	18.60%	2.50%	24.49%	4.94%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	5.43%	12.69%	14.45%	5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between USSE and FMAY is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2023	0.83

The correlation between USSE and FMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

USSE vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USSE	FMAY
Technology	53.1%	37.9%
Financial Services	13.6%	11.7%
Industrials	12.2%	8.4%
Communication Services	7.1%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	9.6%
Healthcare	4.8%	9.1%
Energy	3.6%	3.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

USSE vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USSE

USSE Risk / Return Rank: 60
USSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
USSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
USSE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
USSE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 77
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USSE vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USSE	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.63	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.33	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.65	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.18	13.18	-5.00

USSE vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSE and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USSE vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSE drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSE and FMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	USSE	FMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	-13.60%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-4.22%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-0.48%	-1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-1.98%	-1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	0.85%	+1.96%

Volatility

USSE vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 2.40%. This indicates that USSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USSE	FMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	2.40%	+3.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.57%	5.85%	+7.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.86%	6.86%	+10.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.71%	10.68%	+6.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.71%	10.14%	+6.57%

USSE vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

USSE vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither USSE nor FMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USSE Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USSE and FMAY in my portfolio?

USSE and FMAY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USSE or FMAY?

USSE has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to FMAY (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSE dropped -22.36% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, USSE or FMAY?

On 1-year performance, USSE leads with 26.51% vs 12.00% for FMAY. On fees, USSE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USSE or FMAY?

Over the 1-year period, USSE has performed better with a 26.51% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USSE or FMAY?

USSE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USSE or FMAY?

USSE and FMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between USSE and FMAY?

USSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FMAY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Segall Bryant & Hamill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for USSE and 0.85% for FMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.