USSCX vs. FDTRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

USSCX (USAA Science & Technology Fund) and FDTRX (Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, USSCX returned 14.17%/yr vs 16.87%/yr for FDTRX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. USSCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDTRX.

Performance

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSCX achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, USSCX has underperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 14.17%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.

USSCX

• 1D: 4.51%
• 1M: -4.17%
• 6M: 15.49%
• YTD: 13.59%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 5.07%
• 10Y*: 14.17%
• ALL TIME*: 8.60%

FDTRX

• 1D: 4.48%
• 1M: -5.20%
• 6M: 2.97%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 18.68%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 16.87%
• ALL TIME*: 16.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund	13.59%	17.93%	30.58%	34.01%	-41.76%	-3.45%	60.62%	37.84%	-4.34%	36.06%
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	1.72%	18.97%	31.01%	44.92%	-40.07%	12.90%	58.22%	36.84%	3.22%	39.87%

Correlation

The correlation between USSCX and FDTRX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.94

The correlation between USSCX and FDTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USSCX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USSCX

USSCX Risk / Return Rank: 30
USSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
USSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
USSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
USSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
USSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FDTRX

FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USSCX	FDTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.32	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	0.60	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.07	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	0.38	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	1.10	+3.00

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the FDTRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSCX and FDTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSCX drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than FDTRX's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSCX and FDTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USSCX	FDTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.48%	-48.10%	-31.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.19%	-20.39%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.82%	-26.19%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.07%	-48.10%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.70%	-48.10%	-4.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.11%	-10.50%	+2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.90%	-9.10%	-21.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.68%	7.02%	-1.34%

Volatility

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) have volatilities of 8.71% and 8.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USSCX	FDTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.71%	8.76%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.99%	19.68%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.86%	23.82%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.15%	26.75%	+2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.76%	24.87%	+1.89%

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

USSCX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison

USSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than FDTRX's 10.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	10.21%	10.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.36%	0.00%	0.71%	2.80%	1.71%	3.44%	2.40%
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund	8.29%	9.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.49%	5.36%	27.99%	16.68%	8.31%	4.15%	6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USSCX and FDTRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, USSCX and FDTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, USSCX or FDTRX?

FDTRX has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to USSCX (8.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSCX dropped -79.48% vs FDTRX's -48.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.