USSC.L vs. XXXX
USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while XXXX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USSC.L returned 35.93% vs 86.73% for XXXX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USSC.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for XXXX.
Performance
USSC.L vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 29.32% return.
USSC.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 12.93%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
XXXX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 18.44%
- YTD
- 29.32%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 86.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USSC.L vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 12.93% | 14.73% | 8.33% | 10.57% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 29.32% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSC.L and XXXX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSC.L vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank
USSC.L
XXXX
USSC.L vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSC.L | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 2.34 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 8.95 | +5.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSC.L | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.86 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.87 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
USSC.L vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and XXXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSC.L | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.99% | -62.27% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -37.25% | +29.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -2.88% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -11.60% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 9.73% | -7.19% |
Volatility
USSC.L vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) is 4.04%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that USSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSC.L | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 11.32% | -7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 35.41% | -25.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 46.83% | -30.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 60.75% | -39.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 60.75% | -37.93% |
USSC.L vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
USSC.L vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison
Neither USSC.L nor XXXX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USSC.L and XXXX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XXXX is Leveraged Equities. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while XXXX tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 2.95% for XXXX.
Find the right allocation for USSC.L and XXXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer