USRT vs. PRF
USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USRT is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USRT returned 6.67%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for PRF. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USRT charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.
Performance
USRT vs. PRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly higher than PRF's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has underperformed PRF with an annualized return of 6.67%, while PRF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.
USRT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 17.79%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 6.67%
PRF
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 33.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
USRT vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 17.79% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 43.26% | -8.06% | 25.98% | -4.67% | 5.27% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 15.65% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 16.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between USRT and PRF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007 | 0.65 |
The correlation between USRT and PRF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USRT vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank
USRT
PRF
USRT vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USRT | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.54 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.90 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 20.07 | -12.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USRT vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than PRF's maximum drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and PRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USRT | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -60.35% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -6.59% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -15.82% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.03% | -19.72% | -11.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | -38.16% | -6.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -6.92% | -6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 1.61% | +0.88% |
Volatility
USRT vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 3.60%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USRT | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.60% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 8.17% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 10.95% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 15.23% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 17.68% | +3.62% |
USRT vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
USRT vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison
USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than PRF's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.37% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.56% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USRT and PRF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USRT has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to PRF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs PRF's -60.35%.
On 10-year performance, PRF leads with 13.91% vs 6.67% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.37% for PRF.
USRT is categorized as REIT, while PRF is Large Cap Value Equities. USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.34% for PRF.
PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USRT and PRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer