PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USRT vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USRT vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


USRT

1D
1.25%
1M
0.53%
YTD
15.99%
6M
16.17%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
6.39%

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.87%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USRT vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
15.99%2.44%8.58%13.64%-18.16%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.87%19.65%3.13%-9.58%-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between USRT and ISCMF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USRT vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USRT vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USRTISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

2.31

-1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

5.53

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

11.95

-4.47

USRT vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRT and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USRT vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USRTISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.92%

-25.42%

-44.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-5.69%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-7.62%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-5.26%

+3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-13.36%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.63%

-0.13%

Volatility

USRT vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) have volatilities of 5.04% and 5.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USRTISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.11%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

15.45%

-5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

17.87%

-4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

14.29%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

14.29%

+7.04%

USRT vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USRT vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.60%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


USRT and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to USRT (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 13.59% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ISCMF.

USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

USRT is categorized as REIT, while ISCMF is Commodities. USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.19% for ISCMF.

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USRT and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer