USRT vs. FNDX
USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USRT is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USRT returned 6.67%/yr vs 14.45%/yr for FNDX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USRT charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
USRT vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 6.67%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.45% annualized return.
USRT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 17.79%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 6.67%
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 15.49%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
USRT vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 17.79% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 43.26% | -8.06% | 25.98% | -4.67% | 5.27% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 15.49% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between USRT and FNDX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between USRT and FNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USRT vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USRT
FNDX
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
USRT
FNDX
Financial Services
USRT
FNDX
Basic Materials
USRT
-
FNDX
Communication Services
USRT
-
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
USRT
-
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
USRT
-
FNDX
Energy
USRT
-
FNDX
Healthcare
USRT
-
FNDX
Industrials
USRT
-
FNDX
Technology
USRT
-
FNDX
Utilities
USRT
-
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USRT vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
USRT
FNDX
USRT vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USRT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.56 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 5.23 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 20.31 | -12.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USRT vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USRT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -37.72% | -32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -6.06% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -16.30% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.03% | -19.06% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | -37.72% | -6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -3.55% | -9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 1.56% | +0.93% |
Volatility
USRT vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.18%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USRT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.18% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 7.58% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 10.45% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 15.21% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 17.51% | +3.79% |
USRT vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USRT vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than FNDX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.56% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USRT and FNDX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USRT has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to FNDX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.45% vs 6.67% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.45% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.44% for FNDX.
USRT is categorized as REIT, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USRT and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer