PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USRT vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USRT vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 6.67%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.45% annualized return.


USRT

1D
0.94%
1M
3.13%
YTD
17.79%
6M
17.95%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
6.67%

FNDX

1D
0.90%
1M
2.66%
YTD
15.49%
6M
14.86%
1Y
31.57%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USRT vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
17.79%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
15.49%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between USRT and FNDX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.60

The correlation between USRT and FNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USRT vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USRT
FNDX

Real Estate

99.4%
1.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
14.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.4%

Energy

-

10.3%

Healthcare

-

12.0%

Industrials

-

9.3%

Technology

-

19.1%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Real Estate

USRT
99.4%
FNDX
1.8%

Financial Services

USRT
0.1%
FNDX
14.1%

Basic Materials

USRT

-

FNDX
3.7%

Communication Services

USRT

-

FNDX
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

USRT

-

FNDX
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

USRT

-

FNDX
7.4%

Energy

USRT

-

FNDX
10.3%

Healthcare

USRT

-

FNDX
12.0%

Industrials

USRT

-

FNDX
9.3%

Technology

USRT

-

FNDX
19.1%

Utilities

USRT

-

FNDX
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USRT vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USRT vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USRTFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.56

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

5.23

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

20.31

-12.52

USRT vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRT and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USRT vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USRTFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.92%

-37.72%

-32.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-6.06%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-16.30%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

-19.06%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-37.72%

-6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-3.55%

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.56%

+0.93%

Volatility

USRT vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.18%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USRTFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

3.18%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

7.58%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

10.45%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

15.21%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

17.51%

+3.79%

USRT vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USRT vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than FNDX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.44%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.56%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


USRT and FNDX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USRT has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to FNDX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.45% vs 6.67% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.45% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.44% for FNDX.

USRT is categorized as REIT, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USRT and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer