USRD vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

USRD (Themes US R&D Champions ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USRD is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past year, USRD returned 14.85% vs 19.23% for TDVG. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. USRD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

USRD vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRD achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's 10.93% return.

USRD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.25%
• 6M: 11.38%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 1Y: 14.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.58%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M
USRD Themes US R&D Champions ETF	$1.97K	$8.97K	$6.57K

USRD vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USRD Themes US R&D Champions ETF	11.87%	12.44%	15.53%	5.32%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between USRD and TDVG is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.72

The correlation between USRD and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

USRD vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USRD	TDVG
Technology	68.0%	27.4%
Healthcare	13.3%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	6.7%
Industrials	4.4%	14.4%
Communication Services	3.4%	0.8%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	6.6%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.5%
Energy	-	4.5%
Financial Services	-	19.3%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

USRD vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USRD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USRD vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USRD	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.87	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.69	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.34	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	2.51	-1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.23	10.48	-8.25

USRD vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRD and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USRD vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRD drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRD and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USRD	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.79%	-19.20%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.49%	-7.24%	-6.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.79%	-0.92%	-6.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-3.67%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	1.73%	+3.40%

Volatility

USRD vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that USRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USRD	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	2.20%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.94%	7.30%	+7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.13%	9.74%	+8.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.34%	13.87%	+5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	13.81%	+5.53%

USRD vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

USRD vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

USRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%
USRD Themes US R&D Champions ETF	0.38%	0.42%	2.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USRD and TDVG in my portfolio?

USRD and TDVG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USRD or TDVG?

USRD has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRD dropped -23.79% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, USRD or TDVG?

On 1-year performance, TDVG leads with 19.23% vs 14.85% for USRD. On fees, USRD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USRD or TDVG?

Over the 1-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 19.23% return vs 14.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USRD or TDVG?

USRD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USRD or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.38% for USRD.

What is the main difference between USRD and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USRD and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.