USPX vs. FLCH
USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USPX returned 12.39%/yr vs -4.93%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USPX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
USPX vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USPX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -6.30% return.
USPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
USPX vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 10.64% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.72% | 26.60% | -7.78% | 3.46% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.30% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between USPX and FLCH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.49 |
USPX vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USPX
FLCH
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USPX
FLCH
Financial Services
USPX
FLCH
Communication Services
USPX
FLCH
Consumer Cyclical
USPX
FLCH
Healthcare
USPX
FLCH
Industrials
USPX
FLCH
Consumer Defensive
USPX
FLCH
Energy
USPX
FLCH
Utilities
USPX
FLCH
Real Estate
USPX
FLCH
Basic Materials
USPX
FLCH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USPX vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
USPX
FLCH
USPX vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USPX | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.09 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.54 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 1.14 | +12.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USPX | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.44 | +1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | -0.17 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.02 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
USPX vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USPX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPX and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USPX | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -62.09% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -15.52% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -25.43% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.60% | -55.78% | +31.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -33.95% | +33.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -30.53% | +26.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 7.38% | -5.38% |
Volatility
USPX vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) is 2.87%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that USPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USPX | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 6.59% | -3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 13.67% | -4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 19.22% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 29.59% | -13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 27.91% | -11.99% |
USPX vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
USPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USPX vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
USPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FLCH's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.52% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USPX and FLCH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCH has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to USPX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USPX dropped -31.21% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
On 5-year performance, USPX leads with 12.39% vs -4.93% for FLCH. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USPX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USPX has performed better with a 12.39% return vs -4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.04% for USPX.
USPX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for USPX and 0.19% for FLCH.
USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USPX and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer