USPX vs. DFND
USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USPX returned 12.39%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USPX charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
USPX vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
USPX vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 10.64% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.72% | 26.60% | -7.78% | 23.80% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between USPX and DFND is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USPX and DFND has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USPX vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USPX
DFND
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USPX
DFND
Financial Services
USPX
DFND
Communication Services
USPX
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
USPX
DFND
Healthcare
USPX
DFND
Industrials
USPX
DFND
Consumer Defensive
USPX
DFND
Energy
USPX
DFND
Utilities
USPX
DFND
-
Real Estate
USPX
DFND
Basic Materials
USPX
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USPX vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
USPX
DFND
USPX vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USPX | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.02 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.07 | +2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 0.13 | +13.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USPX | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.02 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.21 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.36 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
USPX vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USPX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPX and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USPX | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -22.65% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -3.44% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -12.56% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.60% | -22.65% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | -22.65% | -8.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -3.69% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -5.70% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.70% | -1.70% |
Volatility
USPX vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that USPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USPX | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 0.00% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 6.16% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 10.92% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 22.46% | -6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 19.09% | -3.17% |
USPX vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
USPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
USPX vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
USPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USPX and DFND have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USPX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USPX dropped -31.21% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 5-year performance, USPX leads with 12.39% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USPX has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
USPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for USPX and 1.50% for DFND.
USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USPX and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer