USO vs. MDLZ
USO (United States Oil Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, USO returned 2.94%/yr vs 6.09%/yr for MDLZ. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
USO vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USO achieves a 81.36% return, which is significantly higher than MDLZ's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, USO has underperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 2.94%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.09% annualized return.
USO
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -12.29%
- YTD
- 81.36%
- 6M
- 82.28%
- 1Y
- 56.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
USO vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 81.36% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between USO and MDLZ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2006 | 0.13 |
The correlation between USO and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (3 years) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USO vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank
USO
MDLZ
USO vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Oil Fund LP (USO) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USO | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.98 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | -0.17 | +3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | -0.30 | +6.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USO vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USO drawdown since its inception was -98.19%, which is greater than MDLZ's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USO and MDLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USO | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.19% | -42.52% | -55.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.39% | -25.93% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -29.00% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | -29.14% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | -29.74% | -57.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.65% | -12.59% | -74.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.30% | -11.03% | -64.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.06% | 14.70% | -3.64% |
Volatility
USO vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison
United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 5.46%. This indicates that USO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USO | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.27% | 5.46% | +7.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.99% | 16.28% | +22.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.64% | 22.26% | +22.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.20% | 19.52% | +16.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.03% | 21.03% | +18.00% |
Dividends
USO vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison
USO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USO and MDLZ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USO dropped -98.19% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USO and MDLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer