USO vs. GSLC
USO (United States Oil Fund LP) and GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while GSLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USO returned 5.42%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for GSLC. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. USO charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSLC.
Performance
USO vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USO achieves a 97.64% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 7.14% return. Over the past 10 years, USO has underperformed GSLC with an annualized return of 5.42%, while GSLC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.04% annualized return.
USO
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 25.05%
- 6M
- 84.84%
- YTD
- 97.64%
- 1Y
- 82.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.54%
- 10Y*
- 5.42%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.60%
GSLC
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $78.02M | $62.36M | $41.68M | |
| $1.02B | $802.47M | $996.79M |
USO vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 97.64% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 7.14% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 27.17% | 19.02% | 30.74% | -4.07% | 22.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between USO and GSLC is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2015 | 0.17 |
The correlation between USO and GSLC shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USO vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank
USO
GSLC
USO vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Oil Fund LP (USO) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USO | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.54 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 6.49 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USO vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USO drawdown since its inception was -98.19%, which is greater than GSLC's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USO and GSLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USO | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.19% | -33.69% | -64.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.49% | -9.49% | -23.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.49% | -18.66% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | -24.90% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | -33.69% | -53.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.46% | -1.91% | -83.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.37% | -4.36% | -71.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.47% | 2.24% | +10.23% |
Volatility
USO vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison
United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 2.67%. This indicates that USO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USO | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.60% | 2.67% | +10.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.19% | 9.52% | +31.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.56% | 12.31% | +33.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.67% | 16.69% | +19.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.13% | 17.67% | +21.46% |
USO vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
USO has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
USO vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison
USO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USO and GSLC have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to GSLC (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USO dropped -98.19% vs GSLC's -33.69%.
On 10-year performance, GSLC leads with 14.04% vs 5.42% for USO. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GSLC has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
GSLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
USO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while GSLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for USO and 0.09% for GSLC.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USO and GSLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer