USO vs. ARCC
USO (United States Oil Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, USO returned 2.94%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
USO vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USO achieves a 81.36% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, USO has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 2.94%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.
USO
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -12.29%
- YTD
- 81.36%
- 6M
- 82.28%
- 1Y
- 56.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
USO vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 81.36% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.20% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between USO and ARCC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2006 | 0.20 |
The correlation between USO and ARCC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USO vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
USO
ARCC
USO vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Oil Fund LP (USO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.97 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | -0.26 | +3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | -0.47 | +6.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USO vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USO drawdown since its inception was -98.19%, which is greater than ARCC's maximum drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USO and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.19% | -79.36% | -18.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.39% | -19.35% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -19.35% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | -21.76% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | -56.77% | -29.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.65% | -10.98% | -75.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.30% | -9.10% | -66.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.06% | 10.68% | +0.38% |
Volatility
USO vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.72%. This indicates that USO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.27% | 3.72% | +9.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.99% | 14.83% | +24.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.64% | 18.48% | +26.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.20% | 19.96% | +16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.03% | 25.58% | +13.45% |
Dividends
USO vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
USO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 7.48% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USO and ARCC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USO dropped -98.19% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USO and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer