PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USNZ vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USNZ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNZ achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 66.08% return.


USNZ

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.58%
6M
8.57%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
6.87%
1M
-1.18%
6M
62.18%
YTD
66.08%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNZ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
10.14%17.76%21.96%27.76%0.80%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
66.08%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%-16.77%

Correlation

The correlation between USNZ and DBE is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.01

The correlation between USNZ and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USNZ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNZ
USNZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
USNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
USNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNZ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USNZDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.16

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

6.57

+1.67

USNZ vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNZ and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USNZ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNZ drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNZ and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USNZDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-86.69%

+67.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-24.72%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-24.72%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-36.95%

+35.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-57.20%

+53.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

8.13%

-5.49%

Volatility

USNZ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) is 4.46%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that USNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USNZDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

12.49%

-8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

32.73%

-21.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

36.03%

-22.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

29.89%

-13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

28.40%

-11.77%

USNZ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

USNZ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

USNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than DBE's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.33%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
0.95%1.02%1.14%1.19%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USNZ and DBE have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.49%) compared to USNZ (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNZ dropped -19.16% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, USNZ leads with 19.04% vs 17.13% for DBE. On fees, USNZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USNZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USNZ has performed better with a 19.04% return vs 17.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USNZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.95% for USNZ.

USNZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. USNZ tracks Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USNZ and 0.78% for DBE.

USNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USNZ and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer