PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USNZ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USNZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USNZ having a 11.68% return and VOO slightly higher at 11.69%.


USNZ

1D
0.03%
1M
6.57%
YTD
11.68%
6M
11.70%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNZ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
11.68%17.76%21.96%27.76%0.74%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between USNZ and VOO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.97

The correlation between USNZ and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

USNZ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USNZ
VOO

Technology

41.9%
35.7%

Communication Services

13.4%
11.3%

Healthcare

11.2%
8.5%

Financial Services

10.5%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.2%

Industrials

3.5%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.8%

Utilities

1.1%
2.4%

Energy

0.0%
3.5%

Technology

USNZ
41.9%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

USNZ
13.4%
VOO
11.3%

Healthcare

USNZ
11.2%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

USNZ
10.5%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

USNZ
10.5%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

USNZ
3.5%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

USNZ
3.4%
VOO
4.9%

Real Estate

USNZ
3.3%
VOO
1.9%

Basic Materials

USNZ
1.3%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

USNZ
1.1%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

USNZ
0.0%
VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USNZ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNZ
USNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
USNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
USNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USNZVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

2.53

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

3.43

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.42

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.45

15.95

-3.50

USNZ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNZ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USNZVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.53

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.89

+0.34

Drawdowns

USNZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNZ drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNZ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USNZVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-33.99%

+14.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-8.90%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-18.69%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-3.69%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.91%

+0.60%

Volatility

USNZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that USNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USNZVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.74%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

8.88%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

11.78%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.81%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

18.01%

-1.38%

USNZ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USNZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

USNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.14%1.19%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, USNZ and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USNZ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNZ dropped -19.16% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.73% vs 21.52% for USNZ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 21.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USNZ.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.93% for USNZ.

USNZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. USNZ tracks Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USNZ and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USNZ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer