PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USNZ vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USNZ vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNZ achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return.


USNZ

1D
-0.68%
1M
6.41%
YTD
10.92%
6M
10.66%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
10Y*

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNZ vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
10.92%17.76%21.96%27.76%0.74%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between USNZ and VUG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.94

The correlation between USNZ and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

USNZ vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USNZ
VUG

Technology

41.9%
53.5%

Communication Services

13.4%
17.3%

Healthcare

11.2%
4.6%

Financial Services

10.5%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
12.2%

Industrials

3.5%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
1.5%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.0%

Basic Materials

1.3%
0.6%

Utilities

1.1%
0.9%

Energy

0.0%
0.4%

Technology

USNZ
41.9%
VUG
53.5%

Communication Services

USNZ
13.4%
VUG
17.3%

Healthcare

USNZ
11.2%
VUG
4.6%

Financial Services

USNZ
10.5%
VUG
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

USNZ
10.5%
VUG
12.2%

Industrials

USNZ
3.5%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

USNZ
3.4%
VUG
1.5%

Real Estate

USNZ
3.3%
VUG
1.0%

Basic Materials

USNZ
1.3%
VUG
0.6%

Utilities

USNZ
1.1%
VUG
0.9%

Energy

USNZ
0.0%
VUG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USNZ vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNZ
USNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
USNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
USNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNZ vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USNZVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

1.77

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

2.40

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.69

+0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.59

5.92

+5.66

USNZ vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNZ and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USNZVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.77

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.62

+0.59

Drawdowns

USNZ vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNZ drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNZ and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USNZVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-50.68%

+31.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-16.53%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-22.85%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.51%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-7.09%

+3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

4.71%

-2.20%

Volatility

USNZ vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) is 3.37%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that USNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USNZVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.83%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

12.11%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

15.84%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

22.22%

-5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

21.44%

-4.81%

USNZ vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USNZ vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

USNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
0.94%1.02%1.14%1.19%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, USNZ and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to USNZ (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNZ dropped -19.16% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 3-year performance, VUG leads with 25.93% vs 21.25% for USNZ. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USNZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VUG has performed better with a 25.93% return vs 21.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USNZ.

USNZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

USNZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. USNZ tracks Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USNZ and 0.03% for VUG.

USNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USNZ and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer