USNZ vs. BUFX
USNZ (Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USNZ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USNZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
USNZ vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USNZ achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
USNZ
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USNZ vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USNZ Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF | 10.92% | 13.43% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between USNZ and BUFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USNZ vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
USNZ
BUFX
USNZ vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USNZ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USNZ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 2.68 | -1.47 |
Drawdowns
USNZ vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USNZ drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNZ and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USNZ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -2.87% | -16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.07% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -0.24% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | — | — |
Volatility
USNZ vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USNZ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.02% | 3.98% | +9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 3.98% | +12.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 3.98% | +12.65% |
USNZ vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USNZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
USNZ vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
USNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USNZ Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, USNZ and BUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, USNZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USNZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
USNZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
USNZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USNZ and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for USNZ and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer