USNG vs. PWRZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. USNG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.

Performance

USNG vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

USNG

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.48%
• 6M: 26.80%
• YTD: 30.79%
• 1Y: 40.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWRZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNG vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	-0.40%
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between USNG and PWRZ is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	-1.00

Return for Risk

USNG vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 90
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNG vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USNG	PWRZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.93	—	—

Drawdowns

USNG vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNG drawdown since its inception was -6.82%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNG and PWRZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNG	PWRZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-0.40%	-6.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-0.40%	-4.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-0.31%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USNG	PWRZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.83%	0.62%	+16.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	0.62%	+16.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	0.62%	+16.08%

USNG vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

USNG vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison

USNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.47%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNG and PWRZ in my portfolio?

USNG and PWRZ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USNG or PWRZ?

On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USNG or PWRZ?

USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USNG or PWRZ?

USNG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between USNG and PWRZ?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for USNG and 0.75% for PWRZ.