USNG vs. BBSB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) and BBSB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USNG is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while BBSB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. USNG is actively managed, while BBSB is passively managed. Over the past year, USNG returned 32.07% vs 2.59% for BBSB. Their -0.16 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. USNG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBSB.

Performance

USNG vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNG achieves a 25.43% return, which is significantly higher than BBSB's 0.77% return.

USNG

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 12.87%
• YTD: 25.43%
• 1Y: 32.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.38%

BBSB

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 0.57%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 1Y: 2.59%
• 3Y*: 4.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	$122.97K	$97.67K	$393.59K
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	$437.77K	$274.58K	$158.86K

USNG vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	25.43%	10.51%
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	0.77%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between USNG and BBSB is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

USNG vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 76
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BBSB

BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 92
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USNG vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USNG	BBSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.42	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	4.05	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.49	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	3.62	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.67	14.41	-3.75

USNG vs. BBSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BBSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNG and BBSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USNG vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNG drawdown since its inception was -11.93%, which is greater than BBSB's maximum drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNG and BBSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNG	BBSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-1.57%	-10.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.93%	-0.86%	-11.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.47%	-0.06%	-8.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-0.30%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	0.21%	+2.72%

Volatility

USNG vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) at 0.35%. This indicates that USNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USNG	BBSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	0.35%	+6.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.82%	0.95%	+12.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	1.28%	+16.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	1.65%	+15.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	1.65%	+15.64%

USNG vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

USNG vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison

USNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than BBSB's 3.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	3.45%	3.69%	4.84%	3.50%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.54%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNG and BBSB in my portfolio?

USNG and BBSB have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USNG or BBSB?

USNG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to BBSB (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNG dropped -11.93% vs BBSB's -1.57%.

Which ETF is better, USNG or BBSB?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 32.07% vs 2.59% for BBSB. On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USNG or BBSB?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 32.07% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USNG or BBSB?

BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for USNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USNG or BBSB?

BBSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.54% for USNG.

What is the main difference between USNG and BBSB?

USNG is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while BBSB is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for USNG and 0.04% for BBSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.