USMV vs. XSLV
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and XSLV (Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF) are both Low Volatility funds - USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index while XSLV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.69%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for XSLV. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XSLV.
Performance
USMV vs. XSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than XSLV's 17.73% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has outperformed XSLV with an annualized return of 9.69%, while XSLV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.92% annualized return.
USMV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
XSLV
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $238.33M | $228.63M | $219.79M | |
| $738.10K | $539.24K | $436.49K |
USMV vs. XSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 5.12% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 17.73% | 0.31% | 9.81% | 1.34% | -11.83% | 29.34% | -17.40% | 22.35% | -5.41% | 8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and XSLV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2013 | 0.70 |
The correlation between USMV and XSLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMV vs. XSLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
XSLV
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USMV
XSLV
Healthcare
USMV
XSLV
Financial Services
USMV
XSLV
Consumer Defensive
USMV
XSLV
Utilities
USMV
XSLV
Industrials
USMV
XSLV
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
XSLV
Communication Services
USMV
XSLV
Energy
USMV
XSLV
Real Estate
USMV
XSLV
Basic Materials
USMV
XSLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. XSLV — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
XSLV
USMV vs. XSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMV | XSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.23 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 9.57 | -5.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMV vs. XSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum XSLV drawdown of -44.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and XSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | XSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -44.34% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -7.46% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -18.35% | +8.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -24.72% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | -44.34% | +11.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.42% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -7.21% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.51% | -0.53% |
Volatility
USMV vs. XSLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.63%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | XSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 4.07% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 9.47% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.54% | 13.37% | -4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 16.70% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 19.94% | -5.43% |
USMV vs. XSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XSLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMV vs. XSLV - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than XSLV's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.47% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.55% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 2.49% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 1.87% | 1.96% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and XSLV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSLV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to USMV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs XSLV's -44.34%.
On 10-year performance, USMV leads with 9.69% vs 5.92% for XSLV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USMV has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.
XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.47% for USMV.
USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.25% for XSLV.
XSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and XSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer