PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.79% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 9.85%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.


USMV

1D
-1.06%
1M
1.71%
YTD
1.99%
6M
1.96%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
9.85%

TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
98.25%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.99%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and TQQQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and TQQQ has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USMV vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMV
TQQQ

Technology

30.8%
53.8%

Healthcare

12.5%
4.2%

Financial Services

12.4%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%
7.7%

Utilities

7.5%
1.4%

Communication Services

5.9%
15.8%

Industrials

5.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
12.3%

Energy

3.6%
0.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.1%

Technology

USMV
30.8%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

USMV
12.5%
TQQQ
4.2%

Financial Services

USMV
12.4%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

USMV
10.0%
TQQQ
7.7%

Utilities

USMV
7.5%
TQQQ
1.4%

Communication Services

USMV
5.9%
TQQQ
15.8%

Industrials

USMV
5.7%
TQQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.7%
TQQQ
12.3%

Energy

USMV
3.6%
TQQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

USMV
2.2%
TQQQ
1.1%

Real Estate

USMV
2.2%
TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMVTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

2.83

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

9.20

-6.96

USMV vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMVTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

2.10

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.36

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.65

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.71

+0.15

Drawdowns

USMV vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-81.66%

+48.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-36.97%

+30.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-58.04%

+48.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-81.66%

+63.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-81.66%

+48.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-16.25%

+14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-18.52%

+15.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

11.33%

-9.39%

Volatility

USMV vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.61%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.42%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

20.42%

-17.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.01%

39.33%

-33.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.57%

49.81%

-41.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

66.79%

-54.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

66.11%

-51.60%

USMV vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

USMV vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than TQQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.54%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to USMV (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 9.85% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.43% for TQQQ.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer