USMV vs. STRN
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while STRN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by SmartWay. USMV is passively managed, while STRN is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.
Performance
USMV vs. STRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than STRN's 19.31% return.
USMV
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
STRN
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMV vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.90% | 0.87% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 19.31% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and STRN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. STRN — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
STRN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USMV vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMV | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMV vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than STRN's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and STRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -15.43% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -8.89% | +7.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -3.00% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility
USMV vs. STRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.53% | 26.85% | -18.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 26.85% | -14.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 26.85% | -12.35% |
USMV vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMV vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than STRN's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.49% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and STRN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for STRN.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.
USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while STRN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.59% for STRN.
Find the right allocation for USMV and STRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer