PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. SIZE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. SIZE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than SIZE's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed SIZE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while SIZE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


USMV

1D
0.04%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
0.85%
6M
0.25%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
9.75%

SIZE

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.12%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.56%
1Y
18.60%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. SIZE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
0.85%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
9.23%10.51%14.37%17.78%-15.86%25.05%16.26%28.97%-6.59%18.76%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and SIZE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.76

The correlation between USMV and SIZE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMV vs. SIZE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMV
SIZE

Technology

33.9%
20.0%

Healthcare

12.6%
10.7%

Financial Services

11.7%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
5.3%

Utilities

6.9%
5.4%

Communication Services

6.2%
3.9%

Industrials

6.1%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
11.2%

Energy

2.7%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.5%
5.3%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.3%

Technology

USMV
33.9%
SIZE
20.0%

Healthcare

USMV
12.6%
SIZE
10.7%

Financial Services

USMV
11.7%
SIZE
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

USMV
9.4%
SIZE
5.3%

Utilities

USMV
6.9%
SIZE
5.4%

Communication Services

USMV
6.2%
SIZE
3.9%

Industrials

USMV
6.1%
SIZE
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.7%
SIZE
11.2%

Energy

USMV
2.7%
SIZE
3.7%

Real Estate

USMV
2.5%
SIZE
5.3%

Basic Materials

USMV
2.4%
SIZE
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. SIZE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SIZE
SIZE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SIZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIZE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SIZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIZE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. SIZE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USMVSIZEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

2.34

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.18

9.07

-6.89

USMV vs. SIZE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the SIZE Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and SIZE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USMV vs. SIZE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum SIZE drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and SIZE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVSIZEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-39.15%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-7.97%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-18.71%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-24.03%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-39.15%

+6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.91%

-1.21%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-4.17%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.06%

-0.09%

Volatility

USMV vs. SIZE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.62%, while iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIZE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVSIZEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.85%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

9.82%

-3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

13.00%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

17.43%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

18.72%

-4.20%

USMV vs. SIZE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USMV and SIZE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMV vs. SIZE - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than SIZE's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
1.39%1.50%1.53%1.42%1.59%1.19%1.43%1.35%2.43%1.58%1.88%1.95%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and SIZE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIZE has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to USMV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs SIZE's -39.15%.

On 10-year performance, SIZE leads with 12.04% vs 9.75% for USMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SIZE has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV and SIZE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.39% for SIZE.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SIZE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index.

SIZE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and SIZE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer