USMV vs. SIZE
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and SIZE (iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SIZE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Low Size Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.75%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for SIZE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
USMV vs. SIZE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than SIZE's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed SIZE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while SIZE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.
USMV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 4.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
SIZE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
USMV vs. SIZE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 0.85% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 9.23% | 10.51% | 14.37% | 17.78% | -15.86% | 25.05% | 16.26% | 28.97% | -6.59% | 18.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and SIZE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.76 |
The correlation between USMV and SIZE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMV vs. SIZE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
SIZE
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USMV
SIZE
Healthcare
USMV
SIZE
Financial Services
USMV
SIZE
Consumer Defensive
USMV
SIZE
Utilities
USMV
SIZE
Communication Services
USMV
SIZE
Industrials
USMV
SIZE
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
SIZE
Energy
USMV
SIZE
Real Estate
USMV
SIZE
Basic Materials
USMV
SIZE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. SIZE — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
SIZE
USMV vs. SIZE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMV | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 2.34 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 9.07 | -6.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMV vs. SIZE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum SIZE drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and SIZE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -39.15% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -7.97% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -18.71% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -24.03% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | -39.15% | +6.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -1.21% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -4.17% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.06% | -0.09% |
Volatility
USMV vs. SIZE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.62%, while iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIZE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 3.85% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.13% | 9.82% | -3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.61% | 13.00% | -4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 17.43% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 18.72% | -4.20% |
USMV vs. SIZE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USMV and SIZE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMV vs. SIZE - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than SIZE's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and SIZE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIZE has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to USMV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs SIZE's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, SIZE leads with 12.04% vs 9.75% for USMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIZE has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV and SIZE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.39% for SIZE.
USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SIZE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index.
SIZE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and SIZE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer