PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 9.93%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.


USMV

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.01%
YTD
2.65%
6M
2.61%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
9.93%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
2.65%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and IAU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.07

USMV vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMV
IAU

Technology

30.8%

-

Healthcare

12.5%

-

Financial Services

12.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.0%

-

Utilities

7.5%

-

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Industrials

5.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.2%
100.0%

Technology

USMV
30.8%
IAU

-

Healthcare

USMV
12.5%
IAU

-

Financial Services

USMV
12.4%
IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

USMV
10.0%
IAU

-

Utilities

USMV
7.5%
IAU

-

Communication Services

USMV
5.9%
IAU

-

Industrials

USMV
5.7%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.7%
IAU

-

Energy

USMV
3.6%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

USMV
2.2%
IAU

-

Real Estate

USMV
2.2%
IAU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMVIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.69

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

4.19

-1.92

USMV vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMVIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

1.23

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

1.03

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.84

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.62

+0.24

Drawdowns

USMV vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-45.14%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-19.18%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-19.18%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-20.93%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-21.82%

-11.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-17.70%

+16.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-15.96%

+13.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

7.71%

-5.78%

Volatility

USMV vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.38%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

5.50%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

23.02%

-17.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

26.42%

-17.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

17.95%

-5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

15.90%

-1.39%

USMV vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMV vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and IAU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to USMV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 9.93% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IAU is Gold. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.25% for IAU.

IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer