USML vs. BIDG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

USML (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN) and BIDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - USML tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index while BIDG tracks the Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Both are passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USML charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BIDG.

Performance

USML vs. BIDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USML achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than BIDG's -37.73% return.

USML

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 4.12%
• 6M: 4.82%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 1Y: 7.98%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: —

BIDG

• 1D: -6.54%
• 1M: -6.11%
• 6M: -52.90%
• YTD: -37.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USML vs. BIDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN	5.93%	0.40%
BIDG Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF	-37.73%	17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between USML and BIDG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.17

Return for Risk

USML vs. BIDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USML

USML Risk / Return Rank: 18
USML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
USML Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
USML Omega Ratio Rank: 17
USML Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
USML Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BIDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USML vs. BIDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USML	BIDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.78	—	—

Drawdowns

USML vs. BIDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USML drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, smaller than the maximum BIDG drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML and BIDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USML	BIDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.34%	-64.84%	+29.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-58.56%	+57.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-36.60%	+26.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USML	BIDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.46%	102.99%	-86.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.49%	102.99%	-78.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.16%	102.99%	-78.83%

USML vs. BIDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BIDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

USML vs. BIDG - Dividend Comparison

Neither USML nor BIDG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USML and BIDG in my portfolio?

USML and BIDG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USML or BIDG?

On fees, BIDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USML or BIDG?

BIDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USML or BIDG?

USML and BIDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between USML and BIDG?

USML tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while BIDG tracks Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USML and 0.75% for BIDG.