BIDG vs. SNAG
BIDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - BIDG tracks the Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) while SNAG tracks the Snap Inc. (SNAP). Both are passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
BIDG vs. SNAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIDG achieves a -11.37% return, which is significantly higher than SNAG's -58.93% return.
BIDG
- 1D
- -5.91%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- -11.37%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -15.62%
- YTD
- -58.93%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIDG vs. SNAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BIDG Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | -11.37% | 16.79% |
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -58.93% | 11.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIDG and SNAG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIDG vs. SNAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIDG | SNAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.70 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
BIDG vs. SNAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIDG drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, smaller than the maximum SNAG drawdown of -81.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDG and SNAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIDG | SNAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.34% | -81.94% | +22.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.02% | -65.18% | +24.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.27% | -54.42% | +22.15% |
Volatility
BIDG vs. SNAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIDG | SNAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.98% | 118.38% | -15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.98% | 118.38% | -15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.98% | 118.38% | -15.40% |
BIDG vs. SNAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BIDG and SNAG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
BIDG vs. SNAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BIDG nor SNAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BIDG and SNAG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIDG and SNAG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
BIDG and SNAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BIDG tracks Baidu, Inc. (BIDU), while SNAG tracks Snap Inc. (SNAP).
Find the right allocation for BIDG and SNAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer