PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMF vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMF vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.


USMF

1D
0.08%
1M
3.17%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.58%
1Y
6.68%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*

USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMF vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
4.43%4.60%19.65%13.47%-8.82%21.26%12.01%24.06%-4.72%11.27%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%22.12%

Correlation

The correlation between USMF and USL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.20

The correlation between USMF and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMF vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMF
USL

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.2%

-

Energy

4.1%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Utilities

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Technology

USMF
35.6%
USL

-

Financial Services

USMF
11.8%
USL
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

USMF
11.1%
USL

-

Communication Services

USMF
10.3%
USL

-

Healthcare

USMF
9.3%
USL

-

Industrials

USMF
7.8%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

USMF
5.2%
USL

-

Energy

USMF
4.1%
USL

-

Real Estate

USMF
2.0%
USL

-

Utilities

USMF
2.0%
USL

-

Basic Materials

USMF
0.9%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMF vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMF
USMF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMF vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMFUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.33

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

3.39

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

6.85

-3.74

USMF vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMF and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMFUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.99

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.01

+0.62

Drawdowns

USMF vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMFUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.24%

-89.06%

+52.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-16.76%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-23.33%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-33.82%

+15.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-39.10%

+38.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-61.45%

+57.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

8.27%

-6.12%

Volatility

USMF vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is 2.25%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that USMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMFUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

10.57%

-8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.42%

23.34%

-15.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

28.59%

-17.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

30.09%

-15.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

32.34%

-15.38%

USMF vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

USMF vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
1.31%1.37%1.22%1.33%1.74%1.42%1.34%1.38%1.45%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMF and USL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to USMF (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.05% vs 7.68% for USMF. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.05% return vs 7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

USMF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMF and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer